Case series are at the bottom, contained in the rubric: But, despite this lowly position, there are many instances where valuable knowledge has come from someone taking the trouble to write up cases that are out of the ordinary. Two modern classics are the reports of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and mucosal candidiasis in previously healthy homosexual men 1 and of hepatocellular adenomata in women taking oral contraceptives. There is another circumstance in which authors should write, and journals should publish, descriptive accounts of case series.
Tables Figures All scientific journals have author instructions. Study them carefully and follow them. Some journals may want you to submit without a title page. Some journals want the tables and figures as the last part of the manuscript.
Other journals want you to upload tables and figures as separate files. Some journals may want the acknowledgement in another place. All text should be written with 1. Most journals prefer a font size of The maximum allowed length of a manuscript varies depending on journal.
Item above should be headings in your manuscript. Item 3 Introduction is also a heading in some journals while in others the background text starts directly without a heading.
Check in author instructions how long how many words your manuscript can be. A few journals have no word limit. However, most journals have and for a literature review it would usually be somewhere between 2, words.
The shorter the more likely it is read. It is difficult and very time consuming to shorten a manuscript expressing yourself more succinct. However, if successful the reader will experience a well digested interesting text that reads more easily.
For every sentence you need to ask yourself — is this sentence really necessary? Can I refer to the original publication instead of describing all details? Once you have gone through all sentences you need to start over and ask for every word — is this word really necessary?
Have a look at some of the examples given in the table above. I also states who is corresponding author. Identify the manuscript as a systematic review and meta-analysis if relevant in the title. The title page is a separate page. Some journals prefer it to be the first page of the document.
Other journals want it as a separate file.
The abstract is usually also a separate page coming after the title page but before the introduction. Hence, the introduction starts on a new page. Each paragraph prepares the way for the next paragraph: Begin with describing the topic and why it is an important topic.
You may want to mention prevalence or costs associated with this topic.
You are not supposed to write a new textbook here so this paragraph must not be too long. The rationale for a project is always to solve a problem. In this paragraph describe the unresolved problem associated with the topic.
The problem may be a few examples: It is unclear what the effect of these treatment options are. Sometimes you and your advisors may find that to your knowledge there are no previously published literature reviews.
If that is the case state state this rather than just not addressing previous reviews. In the previous paragraphs you have described the topic, the remaining problem and previous systematic reviews to shed light on the problem.
If previous literature reviews sheed enough light on the problem solved it completely then there would not be a need for a new systematic literature review.
Thus, you need to describe, in light of previous published reviews, why a new review is needed.tion, observational studies with control groups (cohort and case-control), and observational studies without control Steps in Writing a Systematic Review groups (cross-sectional and case series) Although method is important, the quality of a systematic review Research Question depends on the quality of the studies appraised.
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: IDENTIFYING A meta-analysis does not necessarily mandate comprehen- AN ANSWERABLE QUESTION(S) sive inclusion of all studies relevant to a specific topic (eg, as in a systematic review), only the mathematical assimila- The purpose of a systematic review should be to answer an tion of studies.
Systematic review is often applied Early attempts to transfer the procedures from medicine to business a review of studies found that not all.
Systematic review is a powerful research tool systematic review in epidemiology: an introductory guide for early the results of observational studies. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement.
studies in epidemiology: a systematic review. Meta-narrative reviews aim to do a systematic review of studies using either an empiric-holistic (qualitative), empiric-atomistic (quantitative) or mixed methods approach with an ability to embrace studies with very different design and concepts.